Da influência midiática nos casos de grande repercussão no tribunal do júri: a espetacularização do processo penal e a iolação ao pilar constitucional da presunção de inocência

Abstract

The present work aims to analyze the media influence in cases of great repercussion of competence of the jury court and the consequent violations of the principle of the presumption of innocence in the context in which it is presented by the press. Thus, we intend to verify how this influence occurs and critically explore the Isabella Nardoni case and the Boate Kiss case, tracing the relationship between the conviction made by the jury against the accused and the media inflammation made by the media. For this, the hypothetical-deductive method of approach was used, since a hypothesis is proposed for the problem and an attempt is made to verify it throughout the research. In addition, as a method of procedure, bibliographical research was adopted in primary and secondary sources to obtain data and arguments in order to confirm or not the hypotheses raised. Furthermore, the study is justified in view of the sensationalist culture in which it is legitimated by the spectacularization of the Criminal Procedure, especially with regard to publicity around criminal cases under the jurisdiction of the Jury Court and the need to discuss such sensationalism as a commercial strategy for the dissemination of the punitive ideal in society, with regard to Criminal Law, especially when dealing with news of great social outcry for the condemnation of the accused, as in the case of the young Isabella Nardoni and the Boate Kiss case.