Liberdade de expressão e o discurso de ódio: um debate sobre o discurso de ódio proferido por parlamentar quando estendido às redes sociais e seus perigos à democracia.

Abstract

This article discusses some theoretical perspectives that seek to understand freedom of expression within the context of parliamentary activity. It will address the indiscriminate use of the prerogative of Parliamentary Material Immunity when used to spread hate speech and anti democratic rhetoric, exemplified by the case of former federal deputy Daniel Silveira due to a speech made on social media, which was interpreted by the Supreme Federal Court as anti democratic. Thus, concepts surrounding the case will be explored, including freedom of expression, hate speech and its forms, as well as its interpretation in the international context; the rise of social media and the civil framework of the internet. After understanding these concepts, the possible consequences of hate speech uttered by political figures when extended to social networks will be analyzed, highlighting its dangers. To illustrate this, the storming of the Capitol in the United States in 2020 will.